<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>myITLawyer - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-f03e84c9" type="application/json"/><link>http://myitlawyer.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://myitlawyer.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:35:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: My Website Got Blocked by Omantel</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2009/blocked-by-omante/#comment-426519089</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i need skype coz i need to contact my family in India&amp;lt;&amp;lt; makin calls thru omantel card is damn expensive!!  if everyone bans omantel, then they will have to close down their company!! i feel thts the right thing to do!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rufan14</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:35:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fair Dealing Exceptions in UK Copyright Law</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2009/fair-dealing-exceptions-in-uk-copyright-law/#comment-411185716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a good post but can you talk more about the fair use in the US and the case of 'Pretty Woman' &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Koko</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:51:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Software Patents (EU, US, and Japan)</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2009/software-patents-eu-us-japan/#comment-394921348</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was looking for this particular info for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sacramento carpet cleaner</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 06:24:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Censorship</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2010/internet-censorship/#comment-392078695</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The aim of the censorship process is to protect society values and help &lt;br&gt;prevent minors from being exposed to pornographic material. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">laser hair removal melbourne</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 03:37:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Internet Censorship</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2010/internet-censorship/#comment-391284174</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I want to say that this post is awesome, great written and come with almost all significant infos. I’d like to peer more posts like this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stain removal Milwaukee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 06:00:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DRM and Privacy</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2009/drm-and-privacy/#comment-381090391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The future of privacy is increasingly linked to the future of copyright enforcement. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carpet cleaning cincinnati oh</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 06:42:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Private Use of VPN to be Prohibited in Oman</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2010/private-use-of-vpn-to-be-prohibited-in-oman/#comment-321543158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;VPN is really necessary for secure internet connection. I wonder why some people wouldn't want that security anyway.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">US VPN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 01:34:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Private Use of VPN to be Prohibited in Oman</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2010/private-use-of-vpn-to-be-prohibited-in-oman/#comment-127100132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gubhsh I totally agree with you. Also, as Anoutlaw said, I think they are just scaring people. Well, it is already illegal to encrypt data, but I never heard that someone was in trouble because of that!  The TRA could easily say that VPN is illegal because it encrypts traffic. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mehdi </dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:44:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Private Use of VPN to be Prohibited in Oman</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2010/private-use-of-vpn-to-be-prohibited-in-oman/#comment-126696054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It only proves that telecom companies here is very powerful. Like they are connected with the Government yet they are so called Private Companies!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gubhsh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 23:23:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Response to the VPN Regulation Public Consultation</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2010/response-to-the-vpn-regulation-public-consultation/#comment-107519069</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's true, I'm just frustrated about the draft regulation lol. Do you think that they are going to be very serious once the regulation is in the formal form? Perhaps, if there will be nothing like 'jail' we could risk =P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mehdi</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:07:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Response to the VPN Regulation Public Consultation</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2010/response-to-the-vpn-regulation-public-consultation/#comment-106256076</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately there isn't much logic in arguing that VPN should be allowed so that we can use it to access services which are now allowed the country. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blue_Chi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:32:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Response to the VPN Regulation Public Consultation</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2010/response-to-the-vpn-regulation-public-consultation/#comment-106175024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;but your response wasn't helpful for users like me who wona use Skype :(((((&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mehdi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:48:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Private Use of VPN to be Prohibited in Oman</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2010/private-use-of-vpn-to-be-prohibited-in-oman/#comment-75532498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too much work, i think they find it easier just to scare people from doing that. I mean if you are using a wifi in hotel , restaurant, coffee shop etc...  they have no way of knowing who is using the VPN.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They just want to scare people and that is the best way&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anoutlaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 12:16:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Private Use of VPN to be Prohibited in Oman</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2010/private-use-of-vpn-to-be-prohibited-in-oman/#comment-74246425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Bg76, if the usage of a person is monitored by an ISP it should not be too hard for the ISP to figure out that a lot of his traffic is going through a single port making it easy for them to suspect he is using a VPN. I'm not sure if they can prove that it is though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blue_Chi</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Private Use of VPN to be Prohibited in Oman</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2010/private-use-of-vpn-to-be-prohibited-in-oman/#comment-72610475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for a very useful and informative article. Is it actually possible for the use of a VPN to be detected? Or at least, is it possible to distinguish VPN use from accessing a secure website such as those used for online banking etc.? I appreciate this is more an IT question rather than a legal one, but it would be interesting to know if you or your readers can shed any light on this.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bg76</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:19:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Website Got Blocked by Omantel</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2009/blocked-by-omante/#comment-56779274</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Skype is till blocked as of today June 15th 2010. Not only the &lt;a href="http://skype.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;skype.com&lt;/a&gt; domain is blocked but also it is impossible to make calls over skype. the chat works for some strange reason....&lt;br&gt;Of course, also for skype calls, there are ways around the Omantel blocking... so why block in the first place other then saving the monopoly on international calls....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Me</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:44:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fair Dealing Exceptions in UK Copyright Law</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2009/fair-dealing-exceptions-in-uk-copyright-law/#comment-51061891</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Every law is very much active and I think that every man have to respect it. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dog Breeders</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 11:43:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Usename Room214 Infringes Trademark?</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2008/twitter-trademark-room-21/#comment-50605761</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Its now renewed web for social networking here many people can communicate with each others.  Strongly I like it.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Horses For Sale</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 13:12:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Invention Patents in Europe</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2008/europe-patents/#comment-31316381</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haha thats my comment&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sumeja123</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:41:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Invention Patents in Europe</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2008/europe-patents/#comment-31316285</link><description>&lt;p&gt;very weird invention but cool at the same time...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sumeja123</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:39:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Website Got Blocked by Omantel</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2009/blocked-by-omante/#comment-20646564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Kibtar, thanks for passing by.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; I am not on a shared hosting package. I run a number of websites from a single server and yet only one domain name got blocked. I also used Gmail to send my email message. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is unfortunately no "official" line to use to reach the "right department". If you scream and shout you might eventually reach the person in charge, but from personal experience that is very rare to happen and you must have a lot of patience for it. The person in charge is very unlikely to be available outside official working hours.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blue_Chi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:56:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Website Got Blocked by Omantel</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2009/blocked-by-omante/#comment-20644632</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Currently, the only way to have your website unblocked if it gets blocked by Omantel is to follow the procedure I followed"&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;for me I have got some sites unblocked in a matter of minutes, you just need to get to the right department , and by the way they work 24 hours.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;in my opinion, they might have blocked your website because it is sharing its IP with other websites which are blacklisted.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;this will happen in shared hosting plans.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;when you sent email to admin[a t ] omantel dot com, was your email a &lt;a href="http://myitlawyer.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;myitlawyer.com&lt;/a&gt; email?&lt;br&gt;If yes then your website is for sure listed in spam blacklists.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;kind regards&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kibtar</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:22:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The OpenNet Initiative Report on Oman</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2009/opennet-intiative-oman-200/#comment-16866957</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FWIW, most of the URLs which are cited in the profile , based on checking them today, remain blocked, although oddly several of the druggy ones now aren't.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Over time, I've found it most annoying that some areas of Wikipedia are blocked, although inconsistently.  Not surprisingly, several English-language sites that attack HM are blocked, and the whole VOIP thing really annoys a lot of people.  On the whole the filters in Oman seem much less annoying to the average user than those in the UAE, which seem to happen more at the domain-name level (i.e. all of Flickr, etc.).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Muscato</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:01:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The OpenNet Initiative Report on Oman</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2009/opennet-intiative-oman-200/#comment-16276232</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think they probably were unblocked after you tested them. Anyway, check your email for my corrections and notes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Blue_Chi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The OpenNet Initiative Report on Oman</title><link>http://www.myitlawyer.com/2009/opennet-intiative-oman-200/#comment-16270546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Unless we made a huge mistake, there are two possible explanations that I can think of:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1. Your Internet connection is not blocked (I have heard reports from friends in Qatar of being somehow outside the filter, not sure if this happens in Oman)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2. The sites were unblocked after we tested them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are re-testing in the region, so hopefully this round will show us that those sites are unblocked.  Still, do e-mail me, I don't mind being proven wrong!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jillian C. York</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:14:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
